Still from 'A Private Little War' (1967) |
Don Ingalls delivered his
second draft story outline a month after the first, on June 1, 1967 (during the
second day of filming on ‘Who Mourns for Adonais?’). His revised version of the
story had a new title, ‘A Private Little War,’ and was three pages longer than
the first draft. Structurally, the two drafts are very similar, but with added
length, the revised version has room to clarify a few story points and expand
upon the parallels to the American War in Vietnam. Among the changes Ingalls
made in his second draft:
-- The Enterprise’s last visit to Neural is said to have been three months
ago, rather than the two year figure given in the first draft.
-- Neural is now described as
“one of the several planet groups to which the Federation has made commitments
to protect against any acts of aggression… It is absolutely vital to the
maintenance of interplanetary peace that the Klingon threat be met head-on.”
-- Ingalls attempts to
explain the conceit that only Kirk can carry a phaser, writing, “if their real
identity remains unknown, [the landing party] must obviously forego their
normal weapons, except for a ‘just in case’ small hand phaser which Kirk
himself wears on his belt.”
-- The conflict between the
Klingon Empire and the Federation is framed in terms that bring to mind the Domino Theory of the Cold
War. “If the Klingons are let move in here, or anywhere, and they do as they
wish,” writes Ingalls, “the Klingons gain not only satellite-group strength,
but also discredit the Federation’s word and soon other border-line planets who
haven’t yet taken sides, will see that our word is useless. They too will then
swing to the enemy orbit, seeking the best deal they can make….and the strength
of a dangerous, fanatical enemy will grow…and grow. We must protect those we
say we will protect…we must keep our promises.”
-- The idea of bringing back
Kor from ‘Errand of Mercy’ has been dropped. Instead, the character of Krell
appears, although he still recognizes Kirk when the Captain infiltrates the
camp.
-- The dangerous beast in the
story is called the “Neural Great Ape” in this version.
-- The positions of Kirk,
Spock, and McCoy on arming the Central people are more clearly established in
this version. Spock points out that with both sides armed, “the slow but sure
decimation of both camps” could result. McCoy, on the other hand, presents an uncharacteristically
hawkish view. “Why kill a man with slow poison?” Ingalls has the doctor ask.
“If one side is right… morally… if an aggressor must be squashed… well then
squash him! Quickly, humanely! Give Ty-ree advanced weapons that will make the
enemy rifles seem like pea-shooters.” Kirk decides that the only way to follow
his orders and maintain the balance of power on the planet is to provide Ty-ree
with the rifles, although he does try to make peace by meeting with Krell
first. That meeting fails, however, when Krell says he will only accept “the
unconditional surrender of the Central people [and] the withdrawal of Kirk and
any representatives of the Federation.”
-- Ultimately, after he
provides Ty-ree with the rifles, Kirk tells McCoy, “I had to do it, you know.”
In response, “Bones shakes his head…it was a cruel thing to do…what’s our
purpose in this whole thing, anyway?! What’s yours?! A private little war, with
men instead of chess pieces?” Passing a dead soldier, Kirk tells the doctor, “I’m
like him, Bones. I obey orders, and I hope my way is right… This ‘little’ war has
been fought a million times before in a million different places, and it will
probably be fought a million times more…and there isn’t a damn thing you or I
can do about it.”
-- Aboard the Enterprise, at the very end, Kirk
wonders, “We have advisors there now… how long will it be until we have troops?”
At this point, script consultant D.C. Fontana chimed in with a memo of her own, dated June 8, 1967. Like Roddenberry before her, she was worried that the episode had “a close resemblance to ‘Friday’s Child.’” Looking for a way to set the two episodes apart, Fontana suggested using the Romulans instead of the Klingons, and also asked if there was “any point to making the Neuralese less Arabic and perhaps more Mongolian or Apache Indian or something?”
(To be continued in Part Four)
(Part One can be read here, Part Two here).
Image courtesy of Trek Core.
Source:
The Gene Roddenberry Star Trek Television Series Collection (1964-1969)
At this point, script consultant D.C. Fontana chimed in with a memo of her own, dated June 8, 1967. Like Roddenberry before her, she was worried that the episode had “a close resemblance to ‘Friday’s Child.’” Looking for a way to set the two episodes apart, Fontana suggested using the Romulans instead of the Klingons, and also asked if there was “any point to making the Neuralese less Arabic and perhaps more Mongolian or Apache Indian or something?”
Although Ingalls had changed
Kor to Krell – which Fontana pointed out “were the dead ancients…in the movie Forbidden Planet” – since the Klingon
still recognized Kirk on sight, Fontana asked, “Does everyone in the galaxy
know Kirk?” On the same point, she argued that “Krell should not know so much
about Kirk. Kirk is only one man in the entire Star Fleet.”
Despite her reservations,
however, Fontana’s memo was a short one, clocking in at less than one page. Considering
she opened it by praising the story as being “much improved,” I suspect she was
onboard with “A Private Little War,” at least in outline form.
Roddenberry, too, thought the
revised story was an improvement upon the first try, calling it “a good, highly
professional outline” in a June 9, 1967 memo to Gene Coon. He went on to praise
Ingalls in the memo, going as far to state that, “Properly handled Don Ingalls
could become a principle and highly useful STAR TREK writer.”
Still, Roddenberry’s three
page memo was not without criticisms. Among them:
-- He asked that the episode
begin on the planet, thrusting the episode straight into the action.
-- He wondered if it was
necessary for Kirk to have revealed he was from outer space during his previous
visit. “On a semi-primitive world like this, starship personnel visiting the
planet could easily claim they were from some “village” on the other side of
the planet,” wrote Roddenberry. “It would further preserve the integrity of the
theme that we interfere not in the slightest, not even by giving out knowledge
of exactly who we are and where we come from.”
-- He found it impossible for
the Enterprise to have manufactured
so many rifles and ammunition in only three hours, “unless they had an
automated armory already in operation.”
-- He felt Spock and McCoy were
underused and unimportant to the story, and suggested “doing exclusively a Kirk
story.”
-- He asked that the Klingons
operate less in the open, and compared their intervention directly to Vietnam,
writing:
If
Earth knew the Klingons were on the planet…then Earth obviously would be
obligated to not only set things right here, but take action against the
Klingons. In other words, the situation is even closer to the Viet Nam [sic] situation.
North Viet Nam [sic] tries to preserve the illusion, or at least tried to
preserve it for sometime, that they were not sending men and material to South
Viet Nam [sic]. And that way they insisted it was the United States which was
the meddler and the aggressor.
-- Writing more on the story’s
parallels with the American War in Vietnam, Roddenberry further revealed his
stance on that conflict:
Don
has done a good Viet Nam [sic] parallel in this but somehow I sense something
is missing. Perhaps it is carrying the
parallel all the way--i.e. in the Viet Nam [sic] situation if either side makes
a mistake there will be a world wide [sic] holocaust. So the stakes are terribly great. In this story, not to be unkind, mistakes
seem merely that Earth or the Klingon Empire will probe the other is “cheating”
and there will be angry words but it will end there. At any rate let’s discuss.
Ingalls delivered one more
revision to his story outline on June 10, 1967, but this version was
largely the same as the second draft, making only cosmetic changes. With
Roddenberry and Fontana pleased with the outline’s potential, Ingalls went to
work on the teleplay.
(Part One can be read here, Part Two here).
Image courtesy of Trek Core.
Source:
The Gene Roddenberry Star Trek Television Series Collection (1964-1969)
I was amazed that this late in the game, Ingalls could get McCoy's characterization so wrong. We may not have heard him spouting politics, but his hawk views definitely seem out of character.
ReplyDelete